As a rule.
For an international sci or ahci paper, after the editor receives the submission, he will arrange a review and give a reply within 15 to 25 working days.
However.
Articles in liberal arts are generally much longer than papers in engineering and science.
Artibasiae is one of those Buddhist publications that only publishes two issues a year. It is normal for the publication to take a month.
Sakai Katsuko and Gu Weijing have been looking forward to this belated reply for a long time.
Shengzi
I just received a reply from the journal, but I didn’t open it. I think, no matter whether the result is good or bad, joyful or disappointing, since it is your thesis, the first witnesses should be you two children. Share with Gu Weijing and open this email. I wish you success and good luck. Even if you don’t get the reply you expected, I hope you enjoy this process. This is a valuable life experience. Love you dad, Ichi Sakai
Professor Sakai, who is the contact person of the journal, attached a line at the bottom of the forwarded email.
Sakai Kazunari threw his daughter to Yangon because he did not want to get too involved in the creation process of this paper, and was regarded by the outside world as ghostwriting the paper for his daughter.
But in the end, the corresponding author and mailing address of the paper were still Uncle Sakai’s information.
The first author of the paper is the main contributor to the scientific research results and the person who contributed the most to the paper.
The corresponding author of the paper is the responsible person and beneficiary of this achievement.
Sakai Kazunari did not take advantage of the two children.
If there is fraud or academic misconduct in this paper, the author of the communication needs to bear legal responsibility.
The biggest worry for many young university tutors is that their graduate students write nonsense and create academic garbage, and their mailing addresses are also listed.
Please, the instructor doesn’t expect anything from you, please don’t hurt me, okay?
Don’t let me post it.
There are too many people who cannot graduate, and the instructor may also be punished by the department head, so let him go. If this kind of thing is dug out in the future, it will be a big landmine.
In addition, similar things in Japanese academia have a history.
The famous or infamous Japanese female scientist Obokata Haruko was involved in the scandal of falsifying stem cell papers in 2014, and she left academia to change her lifestyle.
The mentor committed suicide.
Sakai Kazunari used his personal reputation to endorse this paper.
The paper written by two high school students broke the consensus again and proposed a controversial research point of view that long before Miss Mary existed, there were unknown female impressionist masters. .
If there are no scholars or institutions with enough weight to endorse this paper, it is very likely that the journal will not accept it.
Although this paper also comes with wineUncle Jing's academic reputation, fortunately, Uncle Sakai has seen the world, and his tone is very calm.
He is a professor at Tama Academy of Art and is also someone who has written some papers.
The number of submissions for high-standard papers is actually very large.
In particular, although Artibasiae is a Swiss publication, among all the ahci index lists, it is known to be more friendly to Asian researchers.
After all, their name is Asian Art
Many scholars from Eastern Xia, Japan and Korea, regardless of their level, love to submit articles to this journal. Hit two poles and try without losing two pounds of meat.
More than 60% of the papers accepted by high-quality journals will be rejected very quickly.
After glancing at the hands of the executive editor and deputy editor, it was directly rejected because of the research direction, thesis level, and even the English grammar level.
It may not be delivered to the editor-in-chief, let alone reviewers.
For a paper submitted by two children who have not yet gone to college.
In the long wait, no news is good news.
It shows that the content of this paper has no major problems at least in the preliminary review, and it can pass the threshold and officially enter the review process.
If this is the case, even if you are rejected, you can try another journal in the field of art papers.
Maybe just change the reviewer and it will pass.
This is the truth.
But when the reply from the journal editor lay in the mailbox of Sakai Katsuko, they were still as nervous as a young couple looking forward to the B-ultrasound results of their first child.
“I took out my notebook so that I can read the emails and write a reply directly based on the reviewers’ opinions. I don’t know whether it’s good news or bad news.”
Katsuko Sakai is no longer sleepy at all. .
More than just not feeling sleepy.
It was as if a little sparrow that had just dozed off suddenly found Awang lying under the tree licking his paws, his heart beating wildly.
Her hand holding the laptop was trembling.
She originally went to Yangon to go to school, and her biggest purpose was to study this paper.
Whether it can be published or not, you will know the fateful verdict as soon as you open the email.
There will only be four answers to the email given by the editor based on the reviewers' opinions
Direct approval, minor revision, major revision, and direct rejection.
Direct approval and direct veto are literally the same. One is the best and the other is the worst. Naturally, there is nothing to say.
If it is minor revision, it means that the paper basically meets the journal's publication standards. After answering several reviewers' doubts and questions about the paper that does not involve the core arguments, it is usually estimated to be acceptable. Drafted.
Nothing is absolute, bad luck, or the tone of the reply is too dismissive, Xiaoxiu will be disliked and become a big one.It is possible to repair it and then reject it later.
The workload of overhaul is very large, which means that the reviewer or editor-in-chief feels that there are fundamental problems in the paper, the core argument cannot be established, and more and more direct evidence needs to be added to the data.
The workload of overhauling a paper is not much easier than the workload of rewriting a paper.
Even art papers don’t have so much experimental data to do.
If the reviewers provide slightly more comments, for a 3,000-word paper, just writing a reply email can easily produce five or six thousand words.
Whether you can survive after the changes depends on luck.
So, if you find that the reviewer’s opinions are particularly negative, or even question whether the paper’s argument itself is innovative or other fundamental issues of principle.
Contributors can basically contact the editor directly to retract the manuscript without having to bother writing a reply.
It doesn’t make much sense.
Rather than rewriting the paper and giving up submitting to another journal, it will save more time.
Then again, the unspoken rule of "minor revisions will definitely be accepted, major revisions will change the journal" is for ordinary papers.
An AHCI paper is a very remarkable achievement in art disciplines. Sir Brown, who is as awesome as oil painting, will publish his journal papers in African Art and the Queen Elizabeth Award. The OBE and the medal are placed together in the display cabinet in the office to show off in front of visitors.
It is even more difficult for people from non-native English-speaking countries.
At the St. Petersburg Academy of Fine Arts, or the highly competitive Academy of Fine Arts in Eastern Xia, even if your original academic qualifications and graduate school are mediocre, an AHCI is enough to qualify for a teaching position.
Well,
Strictly speaking, Gu Weijing lives in Myanmar. According to the official language classification, he, like Indians, is one of the few in Asia whose native language is English. country residents.
But this convenience is only applicable when applying to Commonwealth universities, and you do not need to submit IELTS scores.
It is hard to say whether Myanmar can surpass the Qing Dynasty in terms of the number of high-level papers produced. Don’t look down on the Qing Dynasty. During the Guangxu period, Mr. Xu Shouxu published the top-notch journal Nature.
It is highly questionable whether Myanmar, a country in turmoil with a population of 54 million, can produce an ahci every year.
Faced with a publication of this magnitude, even if the editor requires very extensive revisions, many contributors will be willing to revise them from scratch.
After all, as the saying goes, as long as the manuscript is not rejected directly, there is a chance of publication.
Gu Weijing folded his arms and watched Miss Sakai enter her password on the computer screen and log in to her email. In her ears, she heard the girl whispering unconsciously.
"Passed, passed, it's also good to pass the minor changes. Well, counting the time, we should have a chance to catch up with the first half of the year with minor changes and minor repairs.layout. No, I can’t expect too much. As long as it doesn’t reject the manuscript directly, I’ll be satisfied. Hallelujah, I make a wish. As long as I can publish this article, I will go back to Sensoji Temple and donate all the New Year's money this year to the monk's sesame oil money."
The girl clasped her hands together and shook them in front of her chest. .
"Hallelujah and Sensoji Temple burning incense are combined, won't the gods fight?"
Gu Weijing smiled
Google said, Japan is a typical country where birthdays are celebrated in shrines, weddings are held in churches, and burials are held in Buddhist temples. The main thing is to pay homage to all the gods and bodhisattvas. Gu Weijing still couldn’t help but want to joke.
“One is dad. The gods at home, one is the God of my mother’s home, we are protected by rain and dew, I am not greedy, anyone can bless us. ”
Miss Sakai smiled slightly.
She sniffed, her eyes still fixed on the mailbox interface, and her fingers grabbed the corner of Gu Weijing’s clothes.
p>
"If we write it with such care, it will definitely not be rejected, right?" She turned her head and looked at her boyfriend pitifully.
"No, Katsuko, can you reject it?" It has nothing to do with whether you are careful or not. All project teams who have the courage to contribute to Asian Art are not careless. ”
Gu Weijing thought about it for a while.
He did not follow Sakai Katsuko’s mood and say anything nice.
Many times, a person’s maturity Growing up happened in an instant.
He was once scolded by Tang Ning and felt confused.
If the high school student's paper could be published in Asia. The achievements and recognition brought by art are definitely not less than winning an award at the Singapore Art Exhibition.
Gu Weijing is in a peaceful mood.
Even he was surprised.
“I saw a media interview on the cover paper of Asian Art in 2016. The content was similar to what we wrote, but it was a tripartite artist team from China, Australia and Vietnam. It took thirteen years to follow up and visit tens of thousands of handmade lacquer paintings called snài in Vietnam starting from the 16th century. Even the project leader got parasitic disease and almost died before finally successfully publishing it. paper. In terms of dedication and hard work, the two of us are not outstanding. ”
“But if we write so carefully, we will definitely gain something. "
Gu Weijing took Sakai Katsuko's hand and squeezed it gently, "If you didn't come here to write the paper, I wouldn't have the chance to have such an excellent girlfriend. Isn't it? This is in my heart, these two months. It is much more meaningful than the success or failure of a paper. "
He took the initiative to stare into Shengzi's eyes.
"And don't worry, I figured out a lot of things after I came back from the botanical garden with you that day. Beautiful works of art will speak for themselves. Even if you are worried about our writing level, you have to believe in Carroll's painting level. It is their fault that the editorial department of Asian Art looks down upon such a beautiful oil painting.lose. ”
Sakai Katsuko looked back at her boyfriend, slightly stunned, then a smile rippled from the depths of her eyes, and she also held Gu Weijing’s hand hard.
Sakai Katsuko’s birthday is a few months earlier than the boy next to her.
When the two of them got along on the cruise, Sakai Katsuko was a bit like a sister. In the kiss under the sculpture, Gu Wei was the manager. It felt like it was mixed with a woman's maternal care.
At this moment, Sakai Katsuko felt that she suddenly became a little girl, surrounded by men. There was a solid strength in the child's calm tone that made her feel particularly reassured.
"That's so good, Gu Jun, if my mother hadn't repeatedly told me to hang up the boy and kiss him. Too much will make him feel numb and taken for granted. I will definitely kiss you now. ”
“I think Aunt Sakai’s theory is quite inappropriate”
Miss Sakai rested her head on Gu Weijing’s shoulder and changed the topic, “I’m still nervous now, you Come and see, I'll close my eyes and you tell me your conclusion. ”
Gu Weijing nodded.
He moved the touchpad, double-clicked the email, and quickly skipped the beginning of the reply to the editor and jumped to the end of the long email for review. Reviewers’ Comments
“A total of three reviewers reviewed our paper. The first professor in the reply believed that the views on Van Gogh’s Night Sky Cafe cited too many existing research materials and were not independent enough. The contrast with the colors of the old church on a thunderstorm day was not sufficient. "
"What about the conclusion?" Sakai Katsuko clenched her fingers.
"The final conclusion is orrevision. "
Orrevision means minor repair, and the corresponding one is ajorrevision major repair.
This is undoubtedly good news.
Sakai Katsuko waved lightly Fist.
“The second professor was a bit of a jerk and mentioned six shortcomings. He also thought that some of your English rhetoric was not professional enough, but the final conclusion was that it was just a minor improvement. ”
“That’s great, third professor”
Sakai Katsuko stuck out her tongue, and most of her heart was put back in her stomach.
< p>The editor-in-chief of the journal will summarize the opinions of all reviewers and give the final conclusion based on personal judgment.If two of the three reviewers give the opinion of Xiaoxiu, the probability of rejection by the editor is high. It’s very low, but if the third scholar puts forward too many opinions, he may be dismissed for overhaul.
“The third professor. "
Gu Weijing glanced at the screen twice and exhaled, "The third reviewer's opinion is very short. He thinks this paper can be published directly. "Please remember to bookmark, the latest and fastest website without anti-theft and free reading