Zheng Yiguan looked at Gao Hanwen's kind expression, and then thought about the shocks he experienced when he learned new things. In particular, some new key points cannot be conveyed by the words in the textbook. What should we do if we allow these outsiders to lead and implement? They may go astray, fail to grasp the key points, and even become evidence to deny the new learning?
For example, the textbook emphasizes that the underlying foundation of new learning is independent traders, but many people automatically ignore it when they read it. And this is something that the vast majority of good people today cannot achieve.
Although today's Hangzhou advocates good people, there are still very few people who can make independent transactions. Even among good people, there are countless people who follow the trend.
There are many difficulties in the implementation of new learning, and many people are not aware of these difficulties even when they see the text. After all, we are all human beings. Who would realize that there are differences between people?
In addition, there is always something new to learn. For example, Gao Hanwen recently talked about behavioral psychology in a teacher seminar. In particular, Zheng Yiguan was deeply impressed by the psychological accounting point of view.
The first layer of this impression lies in the absurdity of human behavior. It's obviously just a penny, but it can produce completely different emotions depending on whether it was obtained by accident or not. People always seem to spend every penny on their hard-earned wages, but they squander the unexpected wealth like sand.
How to guide people to view this unexpected standard will inevitably become the key to leading Hangzhou's economy in the future.
I am afraid that most people will not be able to see the second floor. Zheng Yiguan first discussed it with Li Zhi, and then confirmed it with teacher Gao Hanwen.
The real key lies in the understanding of rational independent traders, especially this rational understanding.
Rationality does not mean that everyone will act with self-interest, but that everyone's self-interest also has its own consistent standards.
For example, in this mental account, some people are stronger and some are weaker. A strong person may go on a shopping spree after being given an annual bonus and squander it all, so the whole family will have a great time during the Spring Festival. Weak people value every penny they have, so there is no need to be too frugal in normal times and wait for the holidays to relax for a few days.
The key question is, will mental accounting or other behavioral psychology threaten the attribution of rationality?
Obviously, no, the key to rationality is everyone's own self-interest and consistency. Mental accounting is actually caused by each person's own differentiated assessment of the retained value of a dollar in different scenarios. As long as this differential assessment is consistent, it is rational.
There is no saying that someone who spends money like water is irrational, nor does it mean that someone who spends intensively on holidays is irrational. There is no saying that someone who regards gold and jade as dirt is irrational. There is no saying that someone who is lazy and degenerate and lives in poverty is irrational.
What situation is irrational? It means that it does not have its own value evaluation system, or there is an evaluation but this evaluation is not consistent. This is irrational.
For example, there is a lazy scholar who does not give up for five buckets of rice and never works.I just make a living by going to the wine shop and working as husband-in-law. This is rational. But if the same scholar works as a minister for the first month, works as a lawyer in the next month to earn money to support his family, and then resigns as a minister for a short time. Repeatedly, this is irrational.
Of course, the more common irrationality is the lack of a value evaluation system and the lack of trade-offs and comparisons, blindly following the trend.
In any case, the deepening of the word rationality actually expands the scope of application of new learning. If the new learning is only effective among smart people, it actually denies the foundation of the new learning. Because there are so few smart people, even if there are really smart people, there are times when their emotions get the best of them.
Following the logic that policies rely on rational people and the rationality of guiding good people, the key to future good people's association orders is to design a series of transaction mechanisms that promote rationality. Otherwise, good people will eventually go against the new learning and eventually dig their own graves. , there is no way to compete with the imperial court.
Zheng Yiguan fully agreed with Gao Hanwen's concerns about the seriousness of this matter. If the Good People's Association becomes a good old man who works wholeheartedly for good people, then the result can only be that good people will take advantage of it and free ride on it on a large scale. When good citizens do not participate in associations and can profit from free riding, over time, most good citizens will naturally lose the ability to rationally evaluate associations. A good citizen who only knows how to be obedient. When the time comes, the court will only need to kill the leader of the good people, and the rest will depend on the propaganda. After all, be obedient, and who wouldn’t listen?
It can be said that Xinxue has reached a dangerous situation where one's life and learning will be destroyed if one is not careful. But Zheng Yiguan didn't understand. Even if the others were ignorant and laughed at Yan Yan, why didn't Teacher Gao feel any vigilance and worry? The transcoding has been serious recently, which makes us more motivated and updates faster. Please use your little hands to exit the reading mode. Thank you